[Guide] on VIT - DEF - HP (SPOILER)

[Lingus]

He said Celson's statmixer. I don't know what formula that uses.

Prosper, if you wouldn't mind, would you post your Str and weapon at the time of soloing the DS?

[Seifer]

WH is 31. Just checked, least that's correct.

[Lingus]

Ok good. So it's looking like your theory is standing so far.

Now I want someone to solo a DS with 1 str using no weapon... Good luck.

[Prosper]

I used a katana and it took me 126 hits I think it was something like 63 dam per hit. I'm trying to keep my str a secret for the moment.

[Seifer]

Oh bother! Just post it, or atleast make sure you use the proper damage formula. Plus anyone with half a brain can work it backwards to find your strength.

[DivineLegend]

i'm curious, do monsters regain any hp over time?

[Seifer]

No.

[DivineLegend]

has it been tested? like on a bandit or rock demon? all it would take to test it is to get it secluded, have no1 hit it, and get it to one hit left with a weapon and let it sit over night since no1 goes on at night... maybe i will test it... if i could get a rd over the bridge

[Seifer]

Takes me 10 hits on a BA even if i let it sit for awhile, trust me.

[DivineLegend]

kk, i will trust ya on that

[ARTgames]

Any hint to def of any monster?

[Celson]

Ok I've just tested this. I tested on Ed and his defence without a helmet is 0. So at first I calculated that with me using a short sword, it would do 69 damage to him while he's not wearing a hat, was a success, 69 damage was dealt. Then he wore a froggy hat which gives +3 defence. I calculated that I would hit 53.0769230769231 damage to him, 57 damage was dealt. I would of been satisfied with 52 or 54 damage, but 57 is a difference of 4 and is not close enough to satisfy me. Are you sure this formula is correct?

Btw, if anyone was curious to know, I had 61 strength (not wearing any hats).

[Prosper]

I calculated that I would hit 53.0769230769231 damage to him, 57 damage was dealt.

You calculated wrong. I just typed the formulae in an excel spreadsheet and it gave 56.58 damage. Base being 69 and def being 3.

If you type 69*(.22+(1-.22)/(1+3*.1) on a calculator you might get it wrong.

[Celson]

I calculated that I would hit 53.0769230769231 damage to him, 57 damage was dealt.

You calculated wrong. I just typed the formulae in an excel spreadsheet and it gave 56.58 damage. Base being 69 and def being 3.

If you type 69*(.22+(1-.22)/(1+3*.1) on a calculator you might get it wrong.

I'm doing it in slow steps, and I'm using the formula... 69*(1/(1+3*.1)  since it is shorter and outputs the same result.

3*0.1 = 0.3
+ 1 = 1.3

1/1.3 = 0.7692307692307692

69 * 0.7692307692307692 = 53.07692...


I'm doubting that a calculator is wrong when doing it in those slow steps.

[Prosper]

If you type 69*(.22+(1-.22)/(1+3*.1) on a calculator you might get it wrong.

I actually typed it wrong in this reply I forgot 1 ")" at the end. Maybe thats why you kept getting it wrong. But in the original post its typed correctly. Here is the RIGHT way to calculate in slow steps.

69*(.22+(1-.22)/(1+3*.1))
69*(.22+(1-.22)/(1.3))
69*(.22+(.78)/(1.3))
69*(.22+0.6)
69*(0.82)
56.58